Colorado Window Tint Law 2026
Colorado requires at least 27% on the front side windows, 27% on the back side windows and 27% on the rear window.
As an Amazon Associate, StreetLawful earns from qualifying purchases. Product listings are matched to statutory requirements as we read them — this is not a guarantee of compliance, and we do not test or measure any film ourselves.
Choose a tint level
Our pick at 70% VLT
- 70%VLTARANAARANA 70% VLT 36"x15FT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film | Keep Car Cool, UV Heat Blocking, Daytime Privacy & Anti-Glare, Scratch Resistant, Phone/GPS Friendly, DIY InstallCeramic (nano-ceramic)36″ × 15′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 70% requirement for front side windows; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
More options that clear this figure, darkest first
- 70%VLTARANAARANA 70% VLT 36"x15FT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film | Keep Car Cool, UV Heat Blocking, Daytime Privacy & Anti-Glare, Scratch Resistant, Phone/GPS Friendly, DIY InstallCeramic (nano-ceramic)36″ × 15′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 70% requirement for front side windows; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
- 70%VLTMotoShield ProMotoShield Pro 70% VLT Nano Ceramic Window Tint for Car 40" in x 6' ft 2PLY Roll High Heat Rejection & Glare Reduction Auto Tint Privacy Film, Rejects up to 99% IRR, 99% UV Blocking, Easy DIY ShrinkCeramic (2-ply nano-ceramic PET)40″ × 6′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 70% requirement for front side windows; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
- 70%VLTTOYOCOTOYOCO Ceramic Car Window Tint Film, 70% VLT, 20" x 10FT Window Privacy Film, No Signal Interference, 99% UV Protection & Scratch-Resistant for Side & Rear Windows, DIY InstallCeramic (2-ply)20″ × 10′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 70% requirement for front side windows; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
- 70%VLTVepagooVepagoo Ceramic Car Window Tint Film 70% VLT, 36" x15FT | Daytime privacy, no signal interference, 99% UV block, scratch-resistant, DIY side/rear windows.Ceramic (nano-ceramic)36″ × 15′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 70% requirement for front side windows; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
All 4 films we list that clear this figure. Verify before you tint. We match a film’s own rating against the figure in the statute above. We do not measure film, and a manufacturer rating is not a compliance certificate.
The limits at a glance
Colorado sets the same limits for passenger cars and for SUVs, vans and trucks, so there is nothing to switch between.
Film that may meet the 70% requirement for front side windows
- 27% VLT minimum — measured on the installed glass, film and window togetherC.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
- 70% VLT minimum — measured on the installed glass, film and window together required only if the windows to the rear of the driver are tinted below 27% under (1)(a)(II)C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
- This limit is measured on the installed glass, not on the film. Factory glass blocks light on its own, so film rated at or above the figure can still read below it once applied. Treat these as candidates and verify the installed reading.C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
- This state also restricts film colour: Material on the top four inches of the windshield may not be red or amber, nor may it affect perception of primary colors, distort vision, or carry lettering that distorts or obstructs vision. No colour restriction is stated for the side or rear windows.C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(b)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
Every Colorado tint rule we track
| Rule | Applies to | What the law says | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Windshield strip — how dark the strip may be | All vehicles | No VLT percentage. The top four inches of the windshield may carry NONTRANSPARENT material outright, subject only to colour, glare and depth conditions.DetailThis is the inverse of the common drafting. Most states permit a tinted band and cap how dark it may be; Colorado permits fully nontransparent material and caps only how far down it may reach. Assigning a percentage here — even a permissive one — would misstate the rule, because the statute allows 0% transmittance in that band. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(b) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “nontransparent material may be applied, installed, or affixed to the topmost portion of the windshield subject to” |
| Windshield strip — how far down it may extend | All vehicles | 4 inDetailColorado measures in inches from the top of the windshield and never mentions the AS-1 line, so the depth does not vary with the glazing manufacturer's marking. The permission is introduced by (1)(b): "Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (a) of this subsection (1), nontransparent material may be applied, installed, or affixed to the topmost portion of the windshield subject to the following". | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(b)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “The bottom edge of the material extends no more than four inches measured from the top of the windshield down;” |
| Windshield below the strip | All vehicles | 70% VLT minimum measured on the installed glass + film together DetailThe windshield duty is stated as its own sentence in (1)(a)(I), immediately after the 27% rule for the other windows, and is not qualified by the (1)(a)(II) rear-glass trade. NET_ASSEMBLY basis: the grammatical subject that must "allow" 27% is the WINDOW as composed, covered or treated — "no person shall operate a motor vehicle ... on which any window ... is composed of, covered by, or treated with any material or component that presents an opaque, nontransparent, or metallic or mirrored appearance in such a way that it allows less than twenty-seven percent light transmittance." Colorado never rates the film in isolation, so a 27%-rated film over factory-tinted glass can put the window out of compliance. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “The windshield shall allow at least seventy percent light transmittance.” |
| Front side windows | All vehicles | 27% VLT minimum measured on the installed glass + film together DetailNET_ASSEMBLY basis: the grammatical subject that must "allow" 27% is the WINDOW as composed, covered or treated — "no person shall operate a motor vehicle ... on which any window ... is composed of, covered by, or treated with any material or component that presents an opaque, nontransparent, or metallic or mirrored appearance in such a way that it allows less than twenty-seven percent light transmittance." Colorado never rates the film in isolation, so a 27%-rated film over factory-tinted glass can put the window out of compliance. The front side windows also carry a conditional second duty: if the owner wants the (1)(a)(II) rear-glass allowance, the front side windows must allow at least SEVENTY percent, not merely 27%. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “composed of, covered by, or treated with any material or component that presents an opaque, nontransparent, or metallic or mirrored appearance in such a way that it allows less than twenty-seven percent light transmittance.” |
| All vehicles | 70% VLT minimum measured on the installed glass + film together required only if the windows to the rear of the driver are tinted below 27% under (1)(a)(II) DetailColorado offers a trade rather than a fixed figure. Under (1)(a)(I) every window except the windshield must allow at least 27%. Under (1)(a)(II) the windows to the rear of the driver may go below 27% — with NO stated floor — so long as the front side windows and the windshield both allow at least 70%. Rendering Colorado as a flat "27% rear" state suppresses a lawful configuration; rendering it as "unlimited rear" without the 70% front condition publishes an unlawful one. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “the windows to the rear of the driver, including the rear window, may allow less than twenty-seven percent light” | |
| Back side windows | All vehicles | 27% VLT minimum measured on the installed glass + film together unless the (1)(a)(II) election is taken — see the paired NO_RESTRICTION row DetailThe default figure. Colorado draws no line at the front seat and no line by vehicle class — (1)(a)(I) reaches "any window, except the windshield". Colorado offers a trade rather than a fixed figure. Under (1)(a)(I) every window except the windshield must allow at least 27%. Under (1)(a)(II) the windows to the rear of the driver may go below 27% — with NO stated floor — so long as the front side windows and the windshield both allow at least 70%. Rendering Colorado as a flat "27% rear" state suppresses a lawful configuration; rendering it as "unlimited rear" without the 70% front condition publishes an unlawful one. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “composed of, covered by, or treated with any material or component that presents an opaque, nontransparent, or metallic or mirrored appearance in such a way that it allows less than twenty-seven percent light transmittance.” |
| All vehicles | confirmed No transmittance floor for the side windows to the rear of the driver, provided the front side windows and the windshield each allow at least seventy percent. front side windows and windshield allow at least 70% light transmittance DetailColorado offers a trade rather than a fixed figure. Under (1)(a)(I) every window except the windshield must allow at least 27%. Under (1)(a)(II) the windows to the rear of the driver may go below 27% — with NO stated floor — so long as the front side windows and the windshield both allow at least 70%. Rendering Colorado as a flat "27% rear" state suppresses a lawful configuration; rendering it as "unlimited rear" without the 70% front condition publishes an unlawful one. This is an affirmatively-stated absence of a floor, not an unread gap: (1)(a)(II) removes the 27% duty for these windows and substitutes no other number. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “transmittance if the front side windows and the windshield on such vehicles allow at least” | |
| Rear window | All vehicles | 27% VLT minimum measured on the installed glass + film together unless the (1)(a)(II) election is taken — see the paired NO_RESTRICTION row DetailThe rear window falls under the general "any window, except the windshield" duty in (1)(a)(I). Colorado offers a trade rather than a fixed figure. Under (1)(a)(I) every window except the windshield must allow at least 27%. Under (1)(a)(II) the windows to the rear of the driver may go below 27% — with NO stated floor — so long as the front side windows and the windshield both allow at least 70%. Rendering Colorado as a flat "27% rear" state suppresses a lawful configuration; rendering it as "unlimited rear" without the 70% front condition publishes an unlawful one. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “composed of, covered by, or treated with any material or component that presents an opaque, nontransparent, or metallic or mirrored appearance in such a way that it allows less than twenty-seven percent light transmittance.” |
| All vehicles | confirmed No transmittance floor for the rear window, provided the front side windows and the windshield each allow at least seventy percent. front side windows and windshield allow at least 70% light transmittance Detail(1)(a)(II) names the rear window explicitly — "including the rear window" — so the allowance is not confined to the rear side glass. Colorado offers a trade rather than a fixed figure. Under (1)(a)(I) every window except the windshield must allow at least 27%. Under (1)(a)(II) the windows to the rear of the driver may go below 27% — with NO stated floor — so long as the front side windows and the windshield both allow at least 70%. Rendering Colorado as a flat "27% rear" state suppresses a lawful configuration; rendering it as "unlimited rear" without the 70% front condition publishes an unlawful one. Colorado attaches NO mirror condition to this election, unlike South Carolina and West Virginia. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “the windows to the rear of the driver, including the rear window, may allow less than twenty-seven percent light” | |
| Reflectivity — front side windows | All vehicles | No reflectance percentage. Material presenting a metallic or mirrored appearance is prohibited on any window.Detail(1)(d) reads in full: "No material shall be used on any window in the motor vehicle that presents a metallic or mirrored appearance." The bar is absolute rather than a ceiling, so there is no percentage at which a mirrored film becomes lawful. "Metallic or mirrored appearance" also appears inside the (1)(a)(I) transmittance clause, which independently prohibits it on any window except the windshield. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(d) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “No material shall be used on any window in the motor vehicle that presents a” |
| Reflectivity — back side windows | All vehicles | No reflectance percentage. Material presenting a metallic or mirrored appearance is prohibited on any window.DetailThe (1)(d) prohibition reaches "any window in the motor vehicle" and is not lifted by the (1)(a)(II) rear-glass election, which relieves only the transmittance duty. So a vehicle taking the 70%-front trade may run the rear glass arbitrarily dark but still may not run it mirrored. | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(d) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “metallic or mirrored appearance.” |
| Medical exemption | All vehicles | unclear No published figure Under review — the official sources we read state no figure for this. This is a gap in our research, and it says nothing about what Colorado requires here; the state may set its rule in words rather than a percentage. Not addressed in C.R.S. §42-4-227. The section contains four carve-outs and none of them is medical: (1)(a)(III) for law enforcement vehicles, (1)(c) for glazing approved by federal statute or regulation and installed at manufacture, (1)(e) for legally required certificates or papers, and (4) exempting low-speed electric vehicles from the wiper duty in (2). Whether Colorado provides a medical accommodation elsewhere in Title 42 or by Department of Revenue rule was not determined; no medical rule is asserted either way. | — |
| Certification sticker / label | All vehicles | unclear No published figure Under review — the official sources we read state no figure for this. This is a gap in our research, and it says nothing about what Colorado requires here; the state may set its rule in words rather than a percentage. Not addressed in C.R.S. §42-4-227. The section imposes no labelling, certification or record-keeping duty on installers, manufacturers or vehicle owners, and creates no compliance sticker. Its enforcement mechanism is (3): a class B traffic infraction for violating the section generally, and a class A traffic infraction under (3)(b) for the person who "installs, covers, or treats a windshield or window so that the windshield or window does not meet the requirements of subsection (1)(a)". | — |
| Restricted colors | All vehicles | Material on the top four inches of the windshield may not be red or amber, nor may it affect perception of primary colors, distort vision, or carry lettering that distorts or obstructs vision. No colour restriction is stated for the side or rear windows.Detail(1)(b)(II) reads in full: "The material is not red or amber in color, nor does it affect perception of primary colors or otherwise distort vision or contain lettering that distorts or obstructs vision;". It sits inside the windshield-strip permission in (1)(b), so it does not reach the side or rear glass — where the only constraints are the 27% figure and the metallic/mirrored bar. (1)(b)(III) adds a glare condition: the material "does not reflect sunlight or headlight glare into the eyes of occupants of oncoming or preceding vehicles to any greater extent than the windshield without the material." | C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(b)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read “The material is not red or amber in color, nor does it affect perception of primary” |
| Side mirrors required if the rear window is tinted | All vehicles | unclear No published figure Under review — the official sources we read state no figure for this. This is a gap in our research, and it says nothing about what Colorado requires here; the state may set its rule in words rather than a percentage. Not addressed in C.R.S. §42-4-227. This is a substantive silence worth noting rather than a mere omission: (1)(a)(II) permits arbitrarily dark rear glass — including the rear window itself — with no compensating mirror requirement, where South Carolina and West Virginia both condition a comparable allowance on dual outside mirrors. Colorado conditions it on front-glass clarity instead. | — |
Film that may meet the 27% requirement for the rear window
- 27% VLT minimum — measured on the installed glass, film and window together unless the (1)(a)(II) election is taken — see the paired NO_RESTRICTION rowC.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
- This limit is measured on the installed glass, not on the film. Factory glass blocks light on its own, so film rated at or above the figure can still read below it once applied. Treat these as candidates and verify the installed reading.C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(a)(I) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
- This state also restricts film colour: Material on the top four inches of the windshield may not be red or amber, nor may it affect perception of primary colors, distort vision, or carry lettering that distorts or obstructs vision. No colour restriction is stated for the side or rear windows.C.R.S. §42-4-227(1)(b)(II) — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services) · read
As an Amazon Associate, StreetLawful earns from qualifying purchases. Product listings are matched to statutory requirements as we read them — this is not a guarantee of compliance, and we do not test or measure any film ourselves.
Choose a tint level
Our pick at 35% VLT
- 35%VLTIAQWEIAQWE 35% VLT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film 20 in x 20 ft Roll | High Heat Rejection, UV Block, Privacy, Shatterproof, Scratch Resistant & No Signal InterferenceCeramic (nano-ceramic, 5-layer)20″ × 20′ rollRated 35% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
Our pick at 50% VLT
- 50%VLTIAQWEIAQWE 50% VLT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film 20 in x 20 ft Roll | High Heat Rejection, UV Block, Privacy, Shatterproof, Scratch Resistant & No Signal InterferenceCeramic (nano-ceramic, 5-layer)20″ × 20′ rollRated 50% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
Our pick at 70% VLT
- 70%VLTARANAARANA 70% VLT 36"x15FT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film | Keep Car Cool, UV Heat Blocking, Daytime Privacy & Anti-Glare, Scratch Resistant, Phone/GPS Friendly, DIY InstallCeramic (nano-ceramic)36″ × 15′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
More options that clear this figure, darkest first
- 35%VLTIAQWEIAQWE 35% VLT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film 20 in x 20 ft Roll | High Heat Rejection, UV Block, Privacy, Shatterproof, Scratch Resistant & No Signal InterferenceCeramic (nano-ceramic, 5-layer)20″ × 20′ rollRated 35% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
- 35%VLTRockRoseRockRose 35% Nano Ceramic Car Window Tint 36 in x 25FT 2PLY Privacy Film Heat Block, 99% UVR, and 85% IRR Block for Auto or Home Strong Adhesive, Easy Shrink, Plotter Friendly - CharcoalCeramic (2-ply nano-ceramic)36″ × 25′ rollRated 35% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
- 50%VLTIAQWEIAQWE 50% VLT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film 20 in x 20 ft Roll | High Heat Rejection, UV Block, Privacy, Shatterproof, Scratch Resistant & No Signal InterferenceCeramic (nano-ceramic, 5-layer)20″ × 20′ rollRated 50% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
- 70%VLTARANAARANA 70% VLT 36"x15FT Ceramic Car Window Tint Film | Keep Car Cool, UV Heat Blocking, Daytime Privacy & Anti-Glare, Scratch Resistant, Phone/GPS Friendly, DIY InstallCeramic (nano-ceramic)36″ × 15′ rollRated 70% VLT — may comply with the 27% requirement for the rear window; verify the installed reading.View on Amazon
Showing 4 of the 12 films we list that clear this figure. Verify before you tint. We match a film’s own rating against the figure in the statute above. We do not measure film, and a manufacturer rating is not a compliance certificate.
Sources
- C.R.S. §42-4-227 — Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 (Office of Legislative Legal Services), read
Nearby states
Other Colorado modification laws
Colorado exhaust and muffler laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
Colorado lighting and underglow laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
Colorado lift kit and bumper height laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
Colorado wheel and tire laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
Colorado ECU tuning and emissions laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
Colorado intake laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
Colorado body and appearance laws
Not published yet. We have not researched this category for Colorado — which is a statement about us, not about whether Colorado regulates it.
